2 min remaining
0%
Digital Transformation

Hidup CMS

Postingan ini membahas evolusi CMS, mendiskusikan pergeseran dari manajemen konten ke pengiriman, dan tantangan yang dihadapi oleh vendor dalam beradaptasi dengan permintaan pasar modern.

2 min read
Progress tracked
2 menit baca·

“Content management” is a misnomer, and it has been for years.

It made sense back in the day when all we did was actually manage content. Decoupled systems meant that your content management system and your content delivery system were two different things. You managed content, then you kind of threw it over the wall to some rudimentary delivery framework.

We didn’t see the advent of the modern, coupled CMS until the early 2000s. They were more accurately “content management and delivery” systems, but that’s ungainly, so here we are.

What’s the dividing line? It’s vague, but I’ve tended to split it at the publish button – anything you do to the “left” of publish is management, and anything to the “right” of publish is delivery.

It’s fair to say that most of the recent changes in CMS have happened in delivery. This is natural since we had to solve management challenges first. And management is less volatile than delivery. While management is a process of refinement, evolution, and adjustment; the delivery side is in constant upheaval – it keeps reinventing itself.

This means that systems which are poorly architected on the management side will suffer when trying to adapt on the delivery side. Systems without a solid data management foundation find it hard to stay on the edge of the delivery curve. The level of delivery-side change magnifies architectural shortcomings, and several vendors have had to scrap their systems and write new ones.

The most recent vendor to capitulate is Sitecore. They heavily implied they were abandoning their current CMS architecture in favor of a SaaS approach, and this new approach would be based on their StyleLabs acquisition of 2018. They took the underlying object architecture of the StyleLabs DAM and are using that as their go-to CMS going forward. Apparently, this is the only way they feel they can compete in a headless-centric market environment.

To make that more clear: effectively, Sitecore is deprecating and walking away from the much-vaunted CMS (SiteCore) they’ve been developing for 20-some-odd years. From someone who has been in this industry for 20 years, that’s pretty wild to see.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main shift in CMS discussed in the post?

The main shift discussed is the transition from traditional content management systems, which focused primarily on managing content, to modern systems that integrate content management and delivery. This evolution reflects the need for systems that can effectively handle both aspects, especially in a rapidly changing digital landscape.

Why is the term 'content management system' considered a misnomer?

The term 'content management system' is considered a misnomer because it implies that the primary function is managing content, when in reality, modern systems also focus heavily on content delivery. The distinction is important as it highlights the evolving role of these systems in facilitating seamless content experiences for users.

What challenges do CMS vendors face in today's market?

CMS vendors face significant challenges in adapting their systems to meet modern market demands, particularly due to the constant changes in content delivery mechanisms. Many vendors have struggled with poorly architected systems that hinder their ability to keep up with the fast-paced evolution of delivery methods, leading some to completely overhaul their platforms.

How has Sitecore adapted to the changing CMS landscape?

Sitecore has adapted by announcing a shift to a Software as a Service (SaaS) model, abandoning its long-standing CMS architecture in favor of a new system based on the StyleLabs acquisition. This move is aimed at better positioning themselves in a headless-centric market, demonstrating the need for vendors to innovate continuously to remain competitive.

What implications does the change in CMS focus have for users?

The shift in focus from content management to delivery has significant implications for users, as it emphasizes the importance of seamless, efficient content experiences. Users can expect CMS platforms to evolve in ways that enhance their ability to deliver content across various channels and devices, ultimately improving engagement and accessibility.